![]() 07/02/2014 at 11:10 • Filed to: None | ![]() | ![]() |
even with all these recalls n shit, my investment is still pretty stellar. Granted I only own 40 shares of the company but it's still a fairly nice payout so far.
I'm not sure why the market hasn't thrown GM out of favor with all these problems. It's honestly a bit baffling to me, but I can see why it's happening nevertheless. People believe GM is really too big to fail, and sales numbers haven't really been waning
![]() 07/02/2014 at 11:15 |
|
So do you think now as good a time to invest as the bailout procedure was?
![]() 07/02/2014 at 11:22 |
|
Wait, I've only got a basic understanding of aerodynamics but isn't redirecting the hot air over the top of the car going to reduce downforce? Hot air = less dense, less dense air flowing over top of aerofoil = lift
![]() 07/02/2014 at 11:37 |
|
why the market hasn't thrown them out is simple - Old GM would've just said "tough shit, don't crash" and then cranked out shitbox after shitbox. New GM seems to have laid off the corner cutting that burned them so badly over the years. So they might actually be capable of listening to consumers.
![]() 07/02/2014 at 11:39 |
|
Cancelled out by the fact that more airflow over the wing gives more downforce probably. And dumping the air from the radiator under the car puts more air under the car which is bad for downforce too. Basically having less air under a car makes for more downforce (except when more air under a car gives more downforce). See F1 in the ground effects era v. F1 now.
![]() 07/02/2014 at 11:44 |
|
The difference between engine bay air and ambient relative to air pressure won't be significant enough to generate lift.
![]() 07/02/2014 at 11:50 |
|
THIS. New GM is even shown a willingness to go back and fix all of Old GM's shit.
And yet (troll alert) the UAW is still a thing over there. See? It's not the union's fault GM sucked. It was shitty management all along.